PSPACE is contained in FO(≤, PFP) #
The hard half of the capture theorem FO(≤, PFP) = PSPACE, by iterating the
PSPACE-complete deterministic machine problem: a partial fixed-point
definition DescriptiveComplexity.SpaceTM.mPfp whose block holds one machine
configuration – the block of the SO(TC) membership proof of
DescriptiveComplexity.Problems.Machine.Space – and whose step formulas
advance it:
- from the empty assignment (recognized by its empty state mark, which no configuration has), one step loads the initial configuration – start state, head on the lowest position, initial tape;
- from a configuration that can move – some applicable transition with a
destination, a written symbol and a neighboring position to move to
(
DescriptiveComplexity.SpaceTM.GoOn) – and is not yet accepting, one step is the machine step, determinism making the step formulas functional; - from an accepting or stuck configuration, the step stutters, so that a halting run is exactly a converging iteration.
A machine that loops forever diverges the iteration, and under the
convergence-requiring semantics of DescriptiveComplexity.FixedPointPartial
that alone makes the definition false – no divergence detection, no counter.
The output sentence checks well-formedness and determinism (conditions on the
instance only) and reads acceptance off the stable configuration
(DescriptiveComplexity.dtmAcceptSpace_pfpDefinable).
Whence the capture: every PSPACE problem reduces to the machine problem by a
relativized ordered reduction
(DescriptiveComplexity.le_dtmAcceptSpace_of_mem_PSPACE), and FO(≤, PFP)
definability crosses such reductions
(DescriptiveComplexity.PFPDefinable.of_relOrderedReduction), so
DescriptiveComplexity.pfpDefinable_of_mem_PSPACE and, with the converse
inclusion of DescriptiveComplexity.FixedPointPartialSpace, the capture
theorem DescriptiveComplexity.pfpDefinable_iff_mem_PSPACE.
Formula builders #
In the parameterized style of DescriptiveComplexity.Problems.Machine.Space:
each builder takes the relation symbols it reads, so realization lemmas are
stated over RelMap and specialize to any expansion.
Some element carries both marks.
Equations
Instances For
Dependency graph
The binary relation holds of x and some element.
Equations
Instances For
Dependency graph
τ is an applicable transition: a transition whose source is the
marked state and whose read symbol is the one held by the marked cell.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The head can move from the marked cell to p', in the direction the
transition names.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The machine takes a step: no accepting mark, and some applicable transition with a destination, a written symbol, and a position to move to.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The cell initially holds this symbol: its input symbol, or the blank when no input is given for it.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
x is the lowest position.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
The transition applies, with a destination, a written symbol, and this new symbol written in the marked cell.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The transition applies and moves to this new state.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The transition applies and moves the head to this new position.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
The iterated definition and its semantics #
The state mark is empty: how the iteration recognizes the not-yet-started assignment, which no configuration resembles.
Equations
Instances For
Dependency graph
The step formulas #
The empty-state test, as a formula.
Equations
Instances For
Dependency graph
The step condition, at the machine's symbols.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Dependency graph
The step formulas mean the semantic step #
The iteration follows the run #
Dependency graph
Dependency graph
The capture theorem #
The deterministic space-bounded machine problem is FO(≤, PFP) definable: iterate the machine, stuttering on halting configurations.
Dependency graph
PSPACE is contained in FO(≤, PFP): reduce to the machine problem and
pull the iteration back through the relativized reduction.
Registered in the Lax archive as
Lax134656.PartialFixedPointCapture.pfpDefinable_of_mem_PSPACE.
Dependency graph
The capture theorem FO(≤, PFP) = PSPACE (Abiteboul–Vianu
1989; Ebbinghaus–Flum 1995,
ch. 7): a problem is FO(≤, PFP) definable exactly when it is in PSPACE.
Registered in the Lax archive as
Lax134656.PartialFixedPointCapture.pfpDefinable_iff_mem_PSPACE.
Dependency graph
The capture theorem, logic to logic: FO(≤, PFP) and SO(TC) define the same problems.